Skip to main content

What We Need Is a Diversion...

The TV news couldn't talk about anything today aside from AIG bonuses. I could rant and rave about this, but my betters have shown themselves as such. If you want to read about why taxing the bonuses at 90% is irrational, stupid, tyrannical, and most likely unconstitutional, click here. My short answer? You'd have to give me a helluva bonus to get me to work at AIG or Fannie or Freddie. Either you want the bailout to succeed for these companies, or you don't. You can't have it both ways. (Of course, if you didn't have a government propping up failing institutions, you wouldn't have to worry about this, would you?)

Far more important, however, is this. The Fed is firing up the printing presses to the tune of 1.2 Trillion Dollars.

$1,200,000,000,000.00

We're gonna re-inflate this bubble with, well, inflation. Here's hoping that the monetary folks are right, and that it's much easier to halt inflation than it is to halt deflation.

The point is, we're not even talking about it. Congress and the mainstream media are busy handing out pitchforks and torches to go after AIG employees, instead.

Best quote of the day, from Chris Edwards over at Cato:
Aside from the dangers to liberty from overzealous members of Congress, there are issues of priorities here. While Congress has been busy with this particular inquisition, the Federal Reserve is moving ahead with a new plan to shower the economy with a massive $1.2 trillion cash infusion–an amount 7,200 times greater than the $165 million of AIG retention bonuses.

Keep your eye on the ball, people.

Comments

  1. this may sound a bit controversial, but i will welcome inflation with open arms. It will mean two things, one we will be in the eye of this storm and the system is correcting itself. Second it will mean that my house and car payments as a percentage of my income will dramatically drop over the long term. I do not think we will see inflation though. We are in something far more ominous. In order for there to be inflation we would need to see oil prices go up exponentially. Every time we have had inflation since the beginning of the industrial revolution has been preceded by large spikes in the price of oil. They tried that and it didn't work. The only thing that can fix the situation we are in right now is a massive ground war. Believe it or not we are preparing for one. The State of Michigan is actively converting auto suppliers into military and aerospace manufacturers. Google "DC3 General Bradley Lott" and have a great weekend.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My friend Dani writes me on this:

    "Seriously. I am way more freaked out about mega-inflation than executives getting mega-bonuses, because this is nearly guaranteed to affect me personally.

    I generally subscribe to the quantity theory of money (i.e. inflation = bad news), and banking that this is going to be a cost-push maneuver (where the money supply endogenously expands to accommodate the rising costs) seems to be a very dangerous gamble when things are already such a mess."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

COVID-19 and the Tools We Need to Re-open Wisely

There's a lot of graphs and stats that the news is throwing at people right now. So much so, that you can get information overload trying to make sense of the statistics that have meaning. To quote my old Econometrics professor, "There are three types of lies: 'Lies', 'Damned Lies', and 'Statistics' ". I should also lead with the caveat that I'm an engineer and data nerd by trade, but I'm not an epidemiologist. I welcome feedback from those who have more experience than I do. The most important question we're trying to answer (at least here in Michigan), is "How are we doing?", and "When can we reopen our economy?". With respect to those questions, here's my take on the most important data, and some caveats about what these data are telling us. The four most cited data in news stories are: Total Number of Cases Daily New Cases. Total Number of Deaths Daily New Deaths This post will talk about #1 and #2

The Re-Opening Experiment

We should remind ourselves that, this Memorial Day weekend and the weeks that follow, we are subjects in a grand experiment to see how good we are at social distancing as stay-at-home orders are being slowly lifted. The state's stay-at-home order was never meant to keep you, individually, safe from infection. It was meant to keep hospital's safe from being overwhelmed by too many of us needing them at the same time. In Michigan, the daily new cases of COVID-19 are higher today than they were when we locked down in late March. We are testing whether or not we can open up (with all of our new precautions and protocols) without spiking the rate of spread, but make no mistake: it *is* an experiment, and we *are* the test subjects. Please don't get careless as things start to open up. We need to get our economies back on track, but we are still a long way (and a vaccine away) from being out of the woods. Stay vigilant, folks. Wash your hands. Wear a mask. As has always been the

What Advice Would You Give Your Younger Self?

An old friend recently reached out to me (and presumably others) and asked us what advice we'd give our younger selves, particularly at ages 20, 30 and 40. After writing my response to him, I thought it worth posting myself as well.  The substantive bulk of my response to him follows: ----- The difficult thing is that I really wouldn't change a thing about who I am, so any call for advice feels a bit like a time-traveler scenario where my advice to a younger self would affect the outcome of my present life, and I'm not sure I'd risk it. My experiences shaped me, including the glaring mistakes, and I wouldn't trade places today with anyone on Earth. But, for the sake of argument, let's assume the Many-Worlds Interpretation of quantum physics here, and thus assume I won't mess my own (present) life up. Wibbly-Wobbly. Timey-Wimey. It is also important to note that the question is "What advice would you give your younger self?". The a